93 CURATED Takes.
Plenty of showings and no offers can be a decision problem, not a price problem. This agent stops waiting for the buyer to go first, without announcing a price cut to every buyer at once.
This saved search goes to your own seller, not a buyer. Two of its filters make the price case so you do not have to.
The plan to cut now and cut again later has a cost. One sentence explains it to a seller, and it comes with the buyer's side of the story.
You assume the problem with a seller who priced their home with a chatbot is that the number is too high, so you show up with a CMA and argue about the number. The number is downstream of the data, and in a non-disclosure state the tool will correct itself in front of the seller if you ask it one specific question.
One number from your own MLS shows what share of listings in your area do not sell. A real estate coach shows the math and the one sentence he says to the seller.
Most agents argue with the seller about price at the listing appointment and lose the listing to someone who agreed. This coach takes the seller's number on purpose.
This agent's seller scripts never contain the word reduction. One substituted word is doing the work, and it has to be planted weeks early.
Agree to the seller's number out loud, then ask one question. Three sentences and they name the risks themselves, which is the objection you can actually answer.
Brandon Mulrenin sets the scene on a group coaching call. You want to list at 300. The seller wants 350.
He names what almost everyone does next.
"Most of us get right into tell mode."
Tell mode is the part you are good at. The comps, the days on market, the chart of price reductions, the story about the last seller who chased the market down. All of it is you explaining why the seller is wrong.
Then he gives the replacement out loud, stumble and all.
"We can absolutely list it at 350. You know, there's some risks with that. In your opinion, what … might some of those be?"
And the reason it works.
"So, it's the opposite of telling."
He runs the same move as a general practice. Take any sentence you routinely deliver, like telling them it is a seller's market, and turn it into a question that makes the seller say it instead.
One caution he gives on the call: delivered wrong, this lands as condescending. Say it flat and genuinely curious, not as a trap being sprung.
Almost every overpricing script on the market is a better way to say no. This one says yes first, then makes the seller supply the case against their own number. Two things happen in that single sentence. You stop being the obstacle, so there is nothing left to argue with. And the risks arrive in the seller's voice, which is the only voice they will not push back on.
It also survives the moment you dread, which is the seller digging in and taking the higher number anyway. You already agreed, so nothing was lost. The list of risks you are now holding is theirs, in their words. That makes the price talk two weeks later a matter of reading it back rather than winning it.
Two or three quiet weeks and the seller wants to know why nobody has come. There is a short piece of math that explains it, and it ends with the seller asking for the price cut.
Getting two people who are splitting up to agree on anything twice is the hard part, and the second agreement lands at the worst possible moment. One signature at the listing table removes it.
Every agent has agreed to test a price to keep a listing, on the reasoning that you can always come down later. The number came out in open court, from the portal your seller refreshes every morning, and it is not attention you get back.
A rule set at the listing presentation decides when you call. This is the script for the call itself, down to the moment you stop talking.
Every agent reads a quiet listing as a pricing problem, because price is the only lever they control. But if the showings are happening, the price already did its job — and one number told you that before the house ever went live.
Redfin says nearly half of US sellers gave buyers a concession in May 2026. Its metro figures run from about 3% to about 75%, and one line further down is the one sellers need to hear.
When a seller names a price your data does not support, you either take it and hope, or you argue them down and risk losing the appointment. The writer took the listing at the seller's number with one condition agreed in advance, and the seller never had to come anywhere near the $315,000 the market data showed.
You treat a price reduction as a conversation you will have if the listing stalls, so the first one arrives as bad news you have to break. NAR's data says four or more reductions is the single most common outcome, which makes the reduction schedule part of the listing plan rather than proof that it failed.
Every listing presentation you have been trained on builds to a number, and the rest of the relationship is spent defending it or lowering it. She walks the property, gives no price at all that day, and returns with a list of work that has to be finished before the house goes anywhere near the market.
She never gives a seller one price. She gives a range and two versions of what they keep, and the top of the range becomes the argument for the bottom of it.
A price talk that never argues about the house. It counts the other sellers on the market, then hands the decision back with two options attached.
Sellers argue about the list price because they hear it as a prediction of what the house is worth. One word swap turns it into a dial you can move together.
One question at the kitchen table finds out who picked the old price. Often the answer is the seller, and the time on the market does the rest.
A drop in signed contracts sounds like buyers taking over. Put it next to one other number from your own market and you can tell a buyer's market from a quiet one.
One line in the ownership history can show that selling now would cost the owner money. One agent said so out loud, then named what would change the answer.
Write down the homes your listing competes with on the day it goes live. Weeks later, what happened to them makes the price case, and the seller makes the call.
Every agent who showed the house had a buyer who walked through and passed. One call before the new price goes live gives that buyer a reason to write first.
The sale your seller keeps pointing to looks brand new. One number shows how old its market really is, and one line shows what to ask for instead of a price cut.
Sellers come in with a list of fixes, and some of it will never pay them back. One agent's rule of thumb decides what stays on the list, with room built in for a market that turns mid-project.
An agent can price high, cut later, and still claim homes sell near the list price. Two coaches bring the same ratio figured two ways and let the seller see the gap.
The sellers had no money for the roof, the foundation, the paint, or the carpet. One agent listed it anyway, and what was gathered first went into the price and the listing itself.
You price at the top of the range because you can always come down, and because the bigger number is the one the seller wants to hear. He says the buyer who would have paid the top of your range never walks through the door at all, and the ones who do walk in arrive looking for reasons to knock the price down.
The polite answer sounds like a dodge. One sentence moves the price off your opinion and onto the data, and the next ties the number to getting offers.
A stuck seller hears every choice they have, in a set order, and picks one. The number only comes out after they choose and ask, which changes who is doing the pushing.
One line at the top of an email tells a seller what the homes for sale near them really are. It makes the case for a lower price without ever mentioning price.
You walk into an overpriced listing appointment planning to win the price argument with comparable sales, and you lose the listing to whoever agrees with the seller. The coach on this call gives the price away on purpose and takes something else instead, and he makes it physical enough that the seller sees it every morning.
A Pennsylvania team leader listened to a seller read him an AI answer about her price. He guessed how she had asked it, and one sentence told her to ask it the other way.
Your seller can argue with your opinion of the price. One step before launch means it isn't just your opinion anymore, and it comes with the exact words to say.
You walk a seller's home and give them a number before you leave, because you think leaving without one loses you the listing. The luxury agent in this interview does the opposite on purpose, hands them a list of work instead, and turns down the sellers who say no.
A script for the seller who may not take your number. It tells them now how they will feel if the home sits, and who they will want to blame.
A call that says the house has not sold and the price has to drop confirms the worst a seller thinks of agents. This version asks for one thing, trades it for a written plan, and picks the hour the new price goes live.
Before you talk about your marketing or a number, ask one question about the buyer. One line of rough math then puts an income on whoever buys at that price.
You tell sellers that six months of inventory means a balanced market, because everyone has always said so. The analyst who tracks this weekly says he has never believed it, that four months is closer to normal, and that the national number has only brushed six once or twice in decades.
You answer a seller who will not come down with evidence about the market, inventory, days on market, what buyers are doing, and what they hear is their agent arguing for a smaller check. This coach never mentions the market at all: he moves the conversation to a date six months out and then asks one question about a price they can no longer afford.
You know the price conversation is coming and you put it off, because raising price in week two feels like giving up on the house. Denver's second-quarter numbers put a dollar figure on the delay, and the gap between cutting in week two and cutting in week eight is about twelve times.
Your seller has read that prices in your market are up, and you are trying to explain why their house is not selling into that. A Nashville association president points out that the number they are quoting contains only houses that sold, so the part of the market that failed is invisible inside it.
You look at your seller's pocket of the market and see ordinary owners with ordinary equity, so a handful of distressed sales nearby feels like somebody else's news. The distress in this cycle is concentrated by loan type and purchase year, which means it clusters street by street, and the appraiser does not put an asterisk on a short sale.
You see a listing that has sat, cut twice, and then expired, and you read it as a stubborn seller who will finally be reasonable. Sometimes the reason the price stopped moving is that it hit the payoff, and that is visible from public records before you ever pick up the phone.
Your seller's answer to a stalled listing is a price cut, and your buyer's answer to a stretched budget is asking for closing costs. Two housing analysts describe what builder sales consultants do instead, and it is a question rather than an offer.
You price a condo off the closed sales in the building, which is the correct method and has always worked. If the building has since landed on Fannie Mae's unavailable list, those sales closed with financing that no longer exists, and the comparable is describing a market that is gone.
You have heard one number about whether off-MLS listings sell for less, and whichever one you heard came from a company with a position in the fight. On an industry webinar the studies were laid side by side, including one academic paper that came out the other way and is itself disputed.
You have been taught that "We're going to take it off for a while." is a line the seller learned works on agents, and that the move is to shelve it and keep going. Three coaches here have a way to test it on the call, while The Close reports federal and Zillow research describing owners who said it and then put the house up for rent.
A small reduction feels like progress and buys you another two weeks with the seller, which is why agents keep making them. Below a threshold the market does not register a cut at all, and the only thing the small one buys is time you already did not have.
Signing a price reduction schedule at the listing table is not new, and most of them quietly die at the first scheduled date. The thing that keeps this one alive is a single email the day before, which turns each drop into a decision the seller makes again rather than a fight you have to start.
When showings dry up you reach for a market-wide explanation, because that is how market reports are written. The slowdown is not spread evenly across price points, and the reason has nothing to do with confidence at the top and everything to do with a ceiling at the bottom.
A price reduction feels like a personal failure to a seller, and to most agents, so it gets delayed until the listing is stale enough to make it expensive. The long-run base rate says roughly a third of all homes reduce before they sell, which makes the cut a normal step rather than a verdict.
A seller who insists on testing a high price believes the worst case is a small adjustment in a few weeks. The average cut in February was over forty thousand dollars, and more than half of listings had been sitting past sixty days.
You read the market through price cuts and days on market, which tell you how sellers are adjusting. Delistings tell you something the other two cannot: how many sellers gave up entirely, and this August they gave up less than last year.
The county number is the easiest square footage to find, so it ends up carrying the price per square foot in a pricing conversation. It is a tax record, not a measurement of the house, and building an automated workflow is where that distinction gets decided.
You have been taught to win the overpricing conversation with comps and homes across the street, and every one of those sellers still says they know their own house. The coach on this call takes price off the table completely and hands the seller one number instead — the neighborhood's average days on market — so the calendar delivers the verdict rather than the agent.
Pull three counts for the seller's own neighborhood and the average stops being an argument. It is the denominator, not the price, that explains why their house is still sitting.
A price adjustment turns into an argument because it arrives as your opinion, weeks after the seller stopped enjoying your calls. This agent hands sellers two countable checkpoints before the sign goes up, so the decision at week six is a trigger you both agreed to rather than a debate you have to win.
Everyone reading Florida headlines has settled on insurance and property taxes as the reason prices turned, because those are the costs sellers complain about out loud. The demand side moved much further than either: domestic migration into the state fell from roughly 310,800 people in 2022 to 22,500 in 2025.
The tax card is the fastest square footage in the county, so it ends up inside a good share of the price-per-foot math agents do all week. Appraisers work to a different standard, ANSI Z765, and the practice this agent's team built into its own process is to note the tax-card figure and refuse to price off it.
Everything about a listing appointment is built to arrive at the number: the CMA, the presentation, the price you name before you leave the kitchen. This agent, 23 years into Colorado luxury with a list-to-sale ratio her host puts near 97%, walks the house and gives no price at all that day, and will turn the listing down if the work does not get done.
A seller who wants to pull the listing and try again later thinks it is a private choice. Redfin counted how many sellers did the same in April 2026, and how many who pulled earlier are now back.
A price reduction post is the one piece of content agents publish that actively works against them, because it reads as an admission that the listing is not selling. The same number, attached to the holiday everyone is already shopping around, gets shared instead of pitied.
Sellers read a national headline about price cuts and either panic or dismiss it, and either way they are arguing with a number that has nothing to do with their street. The August data has a three-fold gap between the highest and lowest metros, which means the national figure describes almost nobody.
Agents avoid recommending pre-list work because they cannot promise it pays, and because explaining how a client would fund it means talking about a loan product they are not confident in. The number exists, and so does the reason most agents never raise it.
Half the industry teaches listing below value to manufacture a bidding war, and agents repeat it on listing appointments without ever having tested it. He is direct about why he does not do it, and about what price bracketing actually is, since most people using the term are describing something else.
Sellers anchor on what the neighbor got last spring, and agents soften the correction because rates are what everyone is talking about. Prices have been moving the whole time rates have not: the national median list price fell 2.4% in July to $428,950, the ninth straight month of year-over-year declines.
Florida inventory fell 14% year over year and the bullish read wrote itself. Reventure's analysis says a large share of that decline is sellers pulling listings or never listing at all, which is a completely different market from one where buyers absorbed the homes.
Your seller is comparing themselves to the neighbors and assuming the new subdivision across town is holding firm at a premium. Builders have now cut prices more often than homeowners for three straight quarters, and the median new home is selling for less than the median existing one.
Your seller believes a price cut is an admission that something went wrong, so they will not plan for one. In several large metros close to three in ten listings have already taken a reduction, and the same table shows two metros where list prices are still rising.
A seller who insists on 550 when the comps say 500 puts you in a losing position: take the listing and own the problem, or argue and lose the appointment. He does neither, and gets agreement to the reduction conversation weeks before it is needed.
You open the pricing conversation with the ZIP code's five-year gain, because it is the number that flatters everyone in the room. Averages describe the typical house, and the houses that have to sell are the ones showing you where a buyer will actually step forward.
A seller in a strong district asks you to price for the schools, and the national numbers look like they back them up, with top-rated districts listing 135% above their surrounding metros. That figure is not an adjustment you can apply to a house, and four popular districts in the same analysis actually listed below their metros.
Raw listing counts tell you nothing across markets, because a big county always has more homes for sale than a small one. Measured against each area's own historical normal, Polk County sits about 55% above and Miami-Dade under 7%, which is why one seller has to cut hard and the other does not.
A falling inventory headline reads as a recovery, and your seller will bring it to you as a reason to hold their price. In Florida the supply came down because homeowners stopped listing, and the count of new sellers each month tells you exactly that.
Home prices fell hard across the country after the boom of the early 2000s. The same national measure for 2022 to 2026 tells a very different story, and your own metro tells the rest.
It is the oldest line in real estate, and sellers still use it. A research finding and one Nashville house show what that extra room really costs, in time and in money.
Having admin send the paperwork ahead looks like efficiency, and on most files nobody ever notices. On a seller who has already expired with three agents, a form arriving cold reads as the fourth one giving up on them, and what came back was a termination of the listing agreement with a PDF attached listing everything done wrong.
Your seller believes the risk ends the moment the offer is accepted and that a signed contract is the finish line. Roughly one in seven purchase agreements fell apart in July, and in Atlanta and Houston it is running close to one in five.
Your seller has read that their market is down six percent and has quietly decided they missed the whole thing. A one-year change tells you nothing about the equity a typical owner is actually sitting on, and in the hardest-hit market on the list prices are still roughly 48% above where they stood before the pandemic.
One line at the listing meeting ties any later price talk to a number the seller watches every week. When the time comes, the talk starts from the report, not from you.
A listing goes pending, falls out of escrow, and comes back on the market. The clock you are quoting never restarted.
Zillow publishes two different day counts for the 50 largest metros, side by side. Sellers quote one of them and set the wrong expectation.
Most buyer's market talk is a feeling. Redfin publishes the exact number that settles it, updated every month for 49 metros.
FHFA prints a one-year and a one-quarter price change side by side for the 100 largest metros. In 31 of them the two columns disagree about which way prices moved.
FHFA said in May that national prices rose 1.7% in the first quarter. Its August report restates that same quarter as a different number.
Agents track the price cut and the buyer credit in two different places, so almost nobody adds them up. Put both on one line and the price talk turns into arithmetic.
Most agents hand a seller one page of numbers for one price. This agent changes the numbers in front of them, and the price talk stops being a debate.
Six weeks in, your seller wants to know why the house has not sold. One count, from a stats platform your MLS may already run, splits the answer into two opposite fixes.
An AI tool averages every row in the file, even the sales that do not belong there. Pull those out and the number you show a seller changes.
You can find out what a seller would really take, and there is a point in the call to do it. A coach gives the wording, and names the mistake that undoes it one second later.
© 2026 CURATED For Agents. A CURATED Takes Brand.
3343 Peachtree Road Northeast, Atlanta, GA
Privacy · Terms · support@curatedforagents.com
This one is part of CURATED Pro.
CURATED Pro opens all of this:
We read 7,380 real estate sources in the last 24 hours
and saved you 227 hours.
7 days free, then $21/month. Cancel anytime.
After that, CURATED Pro is 7 days free, then $21/month.
Every script, tactic, and story worth knowing, in one place.
Every tool, the Library, Ask CURATED, and every prompt.
7 days free, then $21/month while launch pricing lasts, less than 70 cents a day.
Cancel anytime.
Get CURATED free in your inbox, every weekday.
Free.
Unsubscribe anytime.
Get CURATED free, every weekday.
Free.
Unsubscribe anytime.
Get CURATED free in your inbox, every weekday.
Free.
Unsubscribe anytime.